Gas TEM timing & dose planner
See when the gas arrives, when you record, and how many electrons reach the specimen.
01 Gas response
Estimate from measured t10 / t90
Use an independent step response representative of the specimen position, measured from the valve command. Fractions refer to the total composition change.
02 Imaging & beam
Stopping camera recording does not stop specimen irradiation. With blanking off, the beam stays on from acquisition start to the end of the time window.
At the specimen
t = 45 sGas change & image acquisition
mol%Cumulative incident fluence
e⁻/ŲAt cursor 62.4 e⁻/ŲBeam-on rate 12.48 e⁻/Ų/s
Playback compresses the time window into 15 seconds. Slide the cursor to inspect any time.
CSV includes complete-frame start/end times, exposure-averaged modeled gas fraction, cumulative fluence and all inputs. Calculations run in your browser.
What this model can tell you
One delayed, well-mixed volume
A valve step reaches an effective observation volume after a delay. Its composition then relaxes with time constant τ. A finite pulse is the difference of two step responses. Gas consumption, adsorption, temperature changes and spatial gradients are excluded.
τ dc/dt = cᵢₙ(t − tᵈ) − ct₉₀ = tᵈ + ln(10)τFor a step: τ = (t90 − t10) / ln(9); td = t10 + τ ln(0.9). The two-point estimate is a starting point; check the full response trace. An outlet MS delay is not automatically the specimen delay. Recalibrate when flow, pressure or temperature changes.
Incident electrons, not a damage threshold
The fluence calculation assumes a constant incident current over a uniformly illuminated rectangle and ideal beam blanking. Enter the illuminated area, which may differ from the camera field of view. STEM scan-area averages do not describe instantaneous probe-peak exposure.
J = I / (e A) · D = J × tᵇᵉᵃᵐFocusing, searching, spectroscopy and prior irradiation are excluded. Lower cumulative fluence does not by itself prove lower beam-induced chemistry: dose rate, gas and specimen matter. Compare fresh areas and beam-off controls. This planner predicts neither reaction rate nor beam damage.
Research context & constants
These sources motivate delay calibration and beam controls; they do not validate this simplified planner for a particular holder.
- Zhang et al. (2022), Data synchronization in operando gas and heating TEM
- Koo et al., Electron-Induced Radiation Chemistry in Environmental Transmission Electron Microscopy
- NIST: e = 1.602176634 × 10⁻¹⁹ C (exact)
Inspired by the interactive teaching approach of Jehyun Lee’s snowflake and iron-oxidation simulators. This tool uses an independent model and implementation. Snowflake ↗ · Iron oxidation ↗