← Planner introduction← 계획기 소개 글
AEML / RESEARCH TOOLS / 01

Gas TEM timing & dose planner

See when the gas arrives, when you record, and how many electrons reach the specimen.

Illustrative defaults · Delayed mixing model · Replace with your measured response
Try a scenario
Model & assumptions ↗
90% of composition change28.4 sMeasured from the valve command
Complete frames12 framesPartial final frames are excluded
Planned incident fluence149.8 e⁻/ŲFrom acquisition start to window end
Less beam-on time90 %Versus continuous beam, same window

01 Gas response

Estimate from measured t10 / t90

Use an independent step response representative of the specimen position, measured from the valve command. Fractions refer to the total composition change.

02 Imaging & beam

Stopping camera recording does not stop specimen irradiation. With blanking off, the beam stays on from acquisition start to the end of the time window.

At the specimen

t = 45 s

Gas change & image acquisition

mol%
Modeled at specimenValve commandExposure
05.51116.5220 s30 s60 s90 s120 s

Cumulative incident fluence

e⁻/Ų
This planContinuous beam
07491,4980 s120 s

At cursor 62.4 e⁻/ŲBeam-on rate 12.48 e⁻/Ų/s

45 s

Playback compresses the time window into 15 seconds. Slide the cursor to inspect any time.

CSV includes complete-frame start/end times, exposure-averaged modeled gas fraction, cumulative fluence and all inputs. Calculations run in your browser.

MODEL / VERSION 1

What this model can tell you

One delayed, well-mixed volume

A valve step reaches an effective observation volume after a delay. Its composition then relaxes with time constant τ. A finite pulse is the difference of two step responses. Gas consumption, adsorption, temperature changes and spatial gradients are excluded.

τ dc/dt = cᵢₙ(t − tᵈ) − ct₉₀ = tᵈ + ln(10)τ

For a step: τ = (t90 − t10) / ln(9); td = t10 + τ ln(0.9). The two-point estimate is a starting point; check the full response trace. An outlet MS delay is not automatically the specimen delay. Recalibrate when flow, pressure or temperature changes.

Incident electrons, not a damage threshold

The fluence calculation assumes a constant incident current over a uniformly illuminated rectangle and ideal beam blanking. Enter the illuminated area, which may differ from the camera field of view. STEM scan-area averages do not describe instantaneous probe-peak exposure.

J = I / (e A) · D = J × tᵇᵉᵃᵐ

Focusing, searching, spectroscopy and prior irradiation are excluded. Lower cumulative fluence does not by itself prove lower beam-induced chemistry: dose rate, gas and specimen matter. Compare fresh areas and beam-off controls. This planner predicts neither reaction rate nor beam damage.

Research context & constants

These sources motivate delay calibration and beam controls; they do not validate this simplified planner for a particular holder.

Inspired by the interactive teaching approach of Jehyun Lee’s snowflake and iron-oxidation simulators. This tool uses an independent model and implementation. Snowflake ↗ · Iron oxidation ↗